Newsletter Send to a friend rss rss print page

 

Home » Awareness » UK & International News » Employment: Using length of service criterion in redundancy selection

 

Awareness - UK News

 

UK UK


22 July 2009

Using length of service criterion in redundancy selection

Since the introduction of legislation outlawing age discrimination in 2006 employers have generally been advised that “last in first out” or other service-related criteria for redundancy selection are best avoided.  However certain employers had binding redundancy selection processes, often negotiated with trade unions and often including length of service as one of a matrix of factors to be taken into account in selection for redundancy. 

One such employer, Rolls Royce, has received confirmation from the Court of Appeal that while there is clearly an element of age discrimination in using length of service as a selection criterion, it may still be lawful if the employer can show that it is a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”. 

Although the decision is helpful to some employers in a similar position to Rolls Royce, establishing objective justification of a potentially discriminatory practice is a high hurdle.  Employment tribunals will look for hard data to evidence that the criterion does indeed support the employer’s stated legitimate aim, and employers will be well-advised to review this regularly to ensure that their justification remains valid in a changing business environment.

Further reading

Rolls Royce PLC v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 387

For further information please contact us.


Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only.  The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice.  If you require assistance in relation to any issue, please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances.

 



 

Go to latest enews

 

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue, please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. No responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or publishers of this article for losses occasioned by reliance on its content.

 

Copying

If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, logo and disclaimer as shown above.